QQ chat For robbery was arrested, has arrests properly?
- Southern Reading launched in Shenzhen in 1634 were up at 21:00 on the 1st data
- A, the eradication of crime in the bud, nothing wrong.
- B, how can chat as evidence of a crime? Wrong.
- C, if the robbery and narcotic these are supposed to signal a joke between friends?
- D, legal literacy drifting away. Silently think QQ is no privacy.
- E, do not QQ do not care.
@ Southern Shenzhen Reading: [QQ chat For robbery was arrested, which should not catch? The eve of the Grand Canal], the three friends to buy tranquilizer gun similar to QQ chat robbery, no action incurs net police found three people were arrested. One of Wang's attorney that the king neither robbed, nor tools to prepare for the robbery, not enough on the "Criminal Law" on the preparation of crime. I launched a poll [QQ chat For robbery was arrested, has arrests properly? 】
Web chat to discuss robbery, police surveillance network was found, shot three men have been arrested yet, this is a look exciting, successful fight against crime news, but think about it, always felt a bit wrong. Web chat how do you people know? Not criminal, or even just verbal discussion stage, can deny that for the preparation of crime? Yesterday, the news is @ Southern readers on the web are in Shenzhen, suddenly has fueled debates, related to vote is also very hot, quickly became the Sina microblogging and mobile micro-Bo's hot topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment